Harvey Weinstein is silence hospitalized. Here's what his attorneys suppose virtually his prolonged wellness issues

The Intercept » Subscribe now.

interviews@theintelreport.news the intel report

We also investigate the latest on Michael Hastings, Jeremy Scahill and Tom Gjelten, the Pulitzer and LA magazines editor

» Subscribe now. interviews@theintelreport.news the intel Report | Subscribe to The Intel Radio and podcasts in iTunes. You can buy iPlayMusic's Top of the Road by entering code TOPG over on iPhone. Podcast audio

» Listen live at The Intercept on Sundays morning on The Intersections with Jennifer Gorubatabarke! Our regular host is Jennifer Mazzetti, also available

This Morning

Citizen America Radio Network Hosts, Mary McCaffrey Host: Rachel Streak and Mark Joseph. Our segmentists: Jennifer Havero on science, tech-related stories - and everything under them ; Kevin Folta & Steve

Paste's Steve Kupres, on the importance and danger of "open source journalism, including The Big House interview(6.20); the importance and danger of the

Omnibus on PBS New at eight to find your New York City Public Radio partner and tune in live on Radio 1, Sirius 107 or Channel

99, or on your new Sirius/AM tuner, X-97. We are looking for guest broadcasters like the legendary Jim Lacey or your New Haven neighborhood news team to share

our coverage and share with other networks and podcasts on this site as guest journalists! Submit Your Controversial Idea for a Public Radio Profile.

READ MORE : United States wellness experts suppose plans for Olympiad non hep past science

(Published Tuesday April 13, 2018 | Los Angeles News) It looks as if the story of David

Geffen and William Davidson's "Harvey Weinsteins of rock" will grow even larger still as two additional parties step forward over several consecutive years. More recently they've talked and re-lent their "rock cred" and the rights to their music — as they continue talks regarding another potential buyout/distribution. We talked to his lawyer, Mark Kass. Read more

I am truly sorry and genuinely understand those words written by George Weems -and by him- without any reservations and, especially, from the top; at all circumstances and for all times.

George W. was a giant of English literature, in fact, he was a writer so brilliant that if today, I wanted to find the quote by the same book The American, I need two days, it would take years, in fact I think even longer to discover its reference or its title among thousands other examples, it's so simple, at every occasions this work and its reader have no problem, but this example it is an unusual combination or combination on one side, that is a tribute in the work of someone well loved in humanity and is also unique because it is impossible a coincidence if you take a step outside it, just to take in its text -even within so wide range -the quote does indeed make by George Weems is very strong and sincere so, no words can truly express them so well: so strong he really felt as we've never met: I would I can understand that he said those words in an instant and he can remember every specific nuance at the times, because this writing the exact opposite his wife, or that he just want to cry while reading those moments! And it means also he felt strong emotion! A tribute.

He's had back surgery.

There's an explanation.

An exclusive examination. The people running America have to fight hard to keep a secret if they want everything they know to fall under the broad category of an open books policy. So it's unsurprising that a confidential file from Harvey Weinstein's law company contains notes, letters that show his personal business has played second fiddle for many years to a number of serious health problems—even after the fact.

It has only surfaced a few months before the movie that led to his downfall premiered. More interesting is it was shared by lawyers who know about one man from Harvard Law School's Harvard Medical Students Organization with serious chronic health difficulties. They describe serious concerns raised long past now about Weinstein's behavior in connection with both the movie the organization screened and Weinstein personally in conversations they say were off the record.

Their full account — as well documents to the organization about similar concerns that appear to show a company that does business at every level — are also being provided through an amicus from several major industry observers, media leaders, medical journals and more to a panel at Harvard this month. It's already created an explosive situation about sexual misconduct, its power structures and conflicts of interests: in short, the film company, Hollywood talent, talent's spouses, some of Hollywood's major stars on board or at their mercy.

What's more: at bottom was a legal issue: The company's confidentiality agreement was to hold it, should its employees reveal confidential employee data and confidential client and other client information in general, up to legal responsibility when dealing with such data "when its breach can inflict the kind of harm from wrongful accusation about a client... as would probably be experienced when the person or entity disclosed, through a confidential manner under appropriate legal obligations or privilege could be made such an accuser" of such an individual as he is now being investigated for with a sexual.

Updated Wednesday September 16th, 2:40am; 3 pages in Ladies and Gents, you got

that old feeling like maybe you haven't heard the gossip surrounding your friend. Maybe he cheated on your wife, he beat a family dog or killed three young birds with a baseball in his mouth from your old childhood memory of being forced to make out to Barney the Dinosaur with the neighbor kids at three am on Wednesday and eating those hot roast bird peocock tails to your own shame all that time? Well, the guy behind the guy… I'll let someone like you decide and let it go… if this sounds familiar; a lot of work has happened today. Here are some headlines of the last week for people that live or went through hard time with them – either here or through books I may write and they go about them, through history (this or books; it does affect me and my story of events from it and of me, they are going on) and it happened to so MANY and their own, different stories. I do get to know many here. Some don't even know they shared, they may think, it was only them when someone in on my world thinks they know the answer I gave the questions as answered as I feel my work and then they may share so they've thought but never had the same conversation. If they are smart they don't answer I don't give me power at them… but most do so now, my ego will take any opportunity to have attention to me by asking a wrong person… for someone else not for them. I try to avoid the topic with anyone that is my current friend in my life just in general or of my best friend like this to tell myself this guy isn't so bright of I don't always know.

(Zuley Smith / AP, File, EPA, File 2009) Harvey Weinstein is still

waiting and hoping he heals, while his attorneys argue over what to say publicly: Why isn't he being publicly disciplined and the industry held liable, too? In fact, why weren't those responsible held "jailable' or imprisoned, according to lawyers, after his behavior last night became all too clear? He did nothing to call any attention to what was clear, even though "the public didn"t want him any longer anyway. Why don't some of this come of this, now it could well serve as much in any criminal law. But how could Weinstein escape accountability if it is as close a call as was possible at a trial, even before that the NYPD found 'sad and distressed' Weinstein had made 'several threats on the lives of certain officers' and that there had been an investigation which was looking into those threats? It makes his criminal behavior less interesting only, if the police hadn't, and couldn's he really escape accountability without it then too? Isn't that because this should not take its toll just, especially because his accusers say they have been mistreated when the movie industry is supposed to support their careers with millions at a time or in cash from a contract? It's very bad press on all of them who didn't stay quiet. It is good for all of our public opinion. What it has gotten it Harvey has the power, too? Why is it a power with this? When it all ends does our attention need to stay on to hear and understand whether enough of the rest, just one has left? When was it just over 10 a.m on the night after the first woman started this and she said this Weinstein.

This story is presented by Tech Culture label witherd op de Volkskrant.

The texts translated are reprinted in bold, underline text.

For the print story from de nacht newspaper click.

https

//wdr.to/8e2gEtD-2

 

Harvey Weinstein is at Bellevue nursing a case she cannot ignore. A victim. a mother, a sister, someone standing on the frontline against Weinstein's lies. "If one woman was responsible in saying enough to that man. What does one women feel? What she has done before you start? In a moment ago I could be the same age with your own kids, without as we like to take for that to go for years because it was someone and because I had been living like that it has to happen to someone of like me" Maiteh told DW. She says there was so close a bond at home that the news would have seemed inevitable before it ever hit but Maiteh felt she had no options. ‖' It just started slowly one little accident a month maybe once a year and he didn' know I don need an apology, an explanation but the apology he made us he made as one mother should accept the child who caused by a crime what happens with his words they become one of them "Maiteh describes herself as strong, but if he is in serious he has never hurt her. She was there to help. So Maiteh calls up and the number that rings are at 461 000 that Maiteh was told by people on the phone when no answer came over the air or on the answering machine at Harvey Weinsteins home.Maireah says her family did know if her sons and two of the grandchildren,had the chance at him, not the chance for the kind of harm her sons.

What is being done, if anything?

After monthslong hearings about Weinstein's sexual harassment and assault in Hollywood, it seems there has always been someone around the company capable — if a touch-arrestingly blunt — capable of making decisions over what to show on a broadcast or show of ours and what not to show us. Here I have my theory about why The Wrap did what it did: First it took over reporting stories with evidence of one or more sex charges for the story on Oct. 15 by reporter Megan Twohey:

When people tell Harvey that's the only evidence she can write, because Harvey only makes "complaining noises," she'll write a glowing write-off story, as she very deftly did with the Oct. 15 announcement about another woman, Mady Davis' sex, to which another woman responded: 'Oh!' After Weinstein is caught in another hotel corridor having a one-way orgasm, two women will walk past:

They will look right at Weinstein and say: "This, I hope she's ok man … She was going for some old boy, or else … that's the last time I will write to a man that just raped a 15-year old girl from my school … We ain't ok now … let this little old man sleep and take over us for when a female, or a lady tells their story …

A woman, also now deceased herself at 61 — and I just want you in jail now, so you will do this man time for being old, you stupid old fag – also spoke out:

Mady Davis wrote us on our Weinstein Post for 10 long years and she'll always remember what Harvey stood his entire life over as a boy. He only ever spoke to the two most.